A top-level, “Start Here”, page for all things ChatGPT.
Contents
WARNINGS
On using AI tools like ChatGPT
- NEVER enter any personal, personally identifiable information (PII) or business sensitive information!
- NEVER trust responses without both your own sanity checks and follow-up questions as applicable.
- Keep in mind ‘the devil is the the details’ and think …
DO CHECK out https://jandp.biz/ChatGTP – Introduction, WARNINGS section for more details.
Getting Started
- ChatGPT – Introduction -/is/chatgpt/chatgpt-introduction/ – page intended for beginners
- Account and Plans (ChatGPT) /is/chatgpt/account_plans/ (ADMIN)
Examples of Q&As
- (Government) Consolidating Animal Shelter Operations (ChatGPT Example) (EXMPLE)
Böcker av Christina Olsénis, och andra författare [ChatGPT exempel] (EXAMPLE)- Car problems – /is/chatgpt/car-problems/ (EXAMPLE)
- Food-Recipes Examples (ChatGPT) (EXAMPLE)
- Social Security (SS) withdrawal strategies; 62, 67, 70; COLA, Inflation, Purchasing Power, … (EXAMPLE)
- What problems are us educational institutions facing? (EXAMPLE)
- Example of Q&A:
2024-10-22 Johan och ChatGPT runt Hembygdsrätt och jordförvärvstillstånd på Åland
- Example of DISCUSSION with ChatGPT
- Asking about references to law texts
- Which turns out incorrect, “Du har rätt – jag missuppfattade tidigare paragrafen.” …
- google ‘AI impact on legal profession’
One infamous case of things going wrong [text from CIO .. Famous AI Disasters] (Google for more sources around this case – In June 2023 Judge Castel imposed):
ChatGPT hallucinates court casesAdvances made in 2023 by large language models (LLMs) have stoked widespread interest in the transformative potential of gen AI across nearly every industry and corner of the business. OpenAI’s ChatGPT has been at the center of this surge in interest but the technology still has a long way to go before it can reliably take over most processes, as attorney Steven Schwartz learned when he found himself in hot water with US District Judge Kevin Castel in 2023 after using ChatGPT to research precedents in a suit against Colombian airline Avianca. Schwartz, an attorney with Levidow, Levidow & Oberman in New York, used the OpenAI gen AI chatbot to find prior cases to support a case filed by Avianca employee Roberto Mata for injuries he sustained in 2019. But at least six of the cases submitted in the brief didn’t exist. In a document filed in May last year, Judge Castel noted the cases submitted by Schwartz included false names and docket numbers, along with bogus internal citations and quotes. Schwartz’s partner, Peter LoDuca, was Mata’s lawyer of record and signed the brief, putting himself in jeopardy as well. In an affidavit, Schwartz told the court it was the first time he had used ChatGPT as a legal research source and was “unaware of the possibility that its content could be false.” He admitted he hadn’t confirmed the sources provided by the AI chatbot, and regretted using gen AI to supplement his legal research, adding he’ll never do so in the future without verifying authenticity. In June 2023, Judge Castel imposed a $5,000 fine on Schwartz and LoDuca, and in a separate ruling in June, Judge Castel dismissed Mata’s lawsuit against Avianca. |